{
  "title": "Cross-Team Initiative Debrief",
  "description": "Capture what happened at the seams of a shared project — where friction emerged, what each team assumed, and what to carry forward.",
  "language": "en",
  "questions": [
    {
      "hint": "Name the project, your team or function, and your role in it.",
      "text": "What initiative or project are we debriefing, and which team are you representing?",
      "type": "text",
      "order": 1,
      "required": true
    },
    {
      "hint": "Specific moments, decisions, or handoffs that went smoothly — and why.",
      "text": "Where did collaboration across teams work well on this initiative?",
      "type": "text",
      "order": 2,
      "required": true
    },
    {
      "hint": "Misaligned expectations, unclear ownership, communication gaps, or conflicting priorities.",
      "text": "Where did cross-team friction slow things down or cause problems?",
      "type": "text",
      "order": 3,
      "required": true
    },
    {
      "hint": "Assumptions about timelines, capabilities, priorities, or how decisions were being made.",
      "text": "What did you assume about another team's work that turned out to be wrong?",
      "type": "text",
      "order": 4,
      "required": true
    },
    {
      "hint": "Ownership, scope, tooling, process — anything where ambiguity created rework.",
      "text": "What should have been decided earlier that caused downstream problems?",
      "type": "text",
      "order": 5,
      "required": true
    },
    {
      "hint": "Meeting cadence, decision rights, shared documentation, escalation paths — anything structural.",
      "text": "What would you change about how cross-team collaboration is structured for the next initiative?",
      "type": "text",
      "order": 6,
      "required": true
    }
  ]
}