Capture what a departing small group leader knows about their group — relationships, rhythms, and what makes it work.
How would you describe the personality and culture of your group?
What makes this group different from a generic small group? What do members seem to value most?
Are there any members carrying particular spiritual or personal weight right now that the next leader should be aware of?
You don't need to share private details — just flag where extra care or follow-through is needed.
What rhythms or practices have helped this group grow together?
Think about format, frequency, rituals, or specific things you do that members respond well to.
What topics or tensions have come up repeatedly that the next leader should know about?
Recurring questions, unresolved discussions, or dynamics the group is still working through.
How do members prefer to stay connected between sessions?
Group chats, email threads, informal meetups — what actually keeps the community alive between meetings?
What would you do differently if you were starting fresh with this group?
What do you know now that would have changed how you approached the first few months?
After each completed session, Mayetik generates a structured AI summary. Here's an example of the output format — the actual content reflects each respondent's answers.
The respondent's answers highlighted three recurring themes — each supported by specific examples drawn from their experience. The summary captures what was said, not what was expected.
Two responses stood out as unusually detailed and pointed to an area worth following up on. The full text of each answer is preserved below the summary.
Based on the patterns in this session, the AI identified three concrete actions for the project team to consider. These are drawn directly from the respondent's own suggestions.
Generated from 6 questions · ~3 min session